• Menu
  • Skip to right header navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary navigation
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

BECOME A 2A DEFENDER CONTACT JOIN/RENEW DONATE
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus

The trusted voice of Minnesota's Gun Owners to Defend and Restore the Right to Keep and Bear Arms

  • About
    • Activities & Results
    • Affiliates & Partners
    • Board of Directors
    • Careers
    • Contact
    • Leadership
    • Media Kit
    • Minnesota Gun Owners Support Fund
    • Minnesota Gun Rights
    • Political Action Committee
  • News
    • Press Releases
  • Elections
    • 2025 Special Election – SD6
    • 2024 General Election Grades & Endorsements
    • Grading & Endorsement Criteria
    • Legislative Scorecard
  • Events
  • Learn
    • Federal Laws
    • Minnesota Laws
    • Minnesota Gun Laws Quick Reference
    • Case Law
    • Frequently Asked Legal Questions
      • Can 18-20-Year-Olds purchase Handguns in Minnesota?
      • Carrying at the State Capitol Complex
      • Constitutional Carry (Permitless Carry)
      • Courthouse Carry
      • Edible Cannabis in MN and your Gun Rights
      • Forced Reset Triggers
      • Long Guns – Carrying
      • Long Guns – Transporting
      • Open Carry
      • Permit to Carry
      • Permit to Carry Reciprocity
      • Permit to Purchase
      • Privately Manufactured Firearms (PMFs)
      • Prohibited Persons
      • Prohibited Places
      • Short Barreled Rifles & Shotguns
      • State v Kyaw Be Bee Explainer (BB Gun in a Car)
      • Suppressors (Silencers)
    • Binary Trigger Ban
    • Red Flag Gun Confiscation Orders in Minnesota
    • Universal Background Checks in Minnesota
  • Programs
    • Legal Action
      • Plaintiff Search
      • MN Gun Owners Caucus v. Walz (Binary Trigger & Single Subject Clause)
      • Christopher v. Ramsey County et al. (State Fair Case)
      • Worth v. Jacobson (18-20 Permit to Carry Case)
      • New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Kevin P. Bruen (US Supreme Court)
      • Anoka Technical College Gun Ban (2019)
      • Ramsey County Elections Gun Ban (2015)
    • Minnesota Gun Report Podcast
    • Minnesota Second Amendment Sanctuaries
    • Minnesota Sheriffs & Gun Control
  • Store
  • Take Action
    • What’s happening in the 2025 Legislative Session?
    • Action Center
    • Bill Tracker
    • Contact your Elected Officials
    • Legislative Scorecard
    • Petitions
    • Historical Legislative Trackers
      • 2016 Legislative Tracker
      • 2017-2018 Legislative Tracker
      • 2023 Session
      • What’s happening in the 2024 MN Legislative Session?
  • Join/Renew
    • Get our Action Alerts
    • Donate
    • Manage your Donations/Membership
    • Join the Caucus or Renew
    • Membership Benefits
    • Reset Password
  • About
    • Activities & Results
    • Affiliates & Partners
    • Board of Directors
    • Careers
    • Contact
    • Leadership
    • Media Kit
    • Minnesota Gun Owners Support Fund
    • Minnesota Gun Rights
    • Political Action Committee
  • News
    • Press Releases
  • Elections
    • 2025 Special Election – SD6
    • 2024 General Election Grades & Endorsements
    • Grading & Endorsement Criteria
    • Legislative Scorecard
  • Events
  • Learn
    • Federal Laws
    • Minnesota Laws
    • Minnesota Gun Laws Quick Reference
    • Case Law
    • Frequently Asked Legal Questions
      • Can 18-20-Year-Olds purchase Handguns in Minnesota?
      • Carrying at the State Capitol Complex
      • Constitutional Carry (Permitless Carry)
      • Courthouse Carry
      • Edible Cannabis in MN and your Gun Rights
      • Forced Reset Triggers
      • Long Guns – Carrying
      • Long Guns – Transporting
      • Open Carry
      • Permit to Carry
      • Permit to Carry Reciprocity
      • Permit to Purchase
      • Privately Manufactured Firearms (PMFs)
      • Prohibited Persons
      • Prohibited Places
      • Short Barreled Rifles & Shotguns
      • State v Kyaw Be Bee Explainer (BB Gun in a Car)
      • Suppressors (Silencers)
    • Binary Trigger Ban
    • Red Flag Gun Confiscation Orders in Minnesota
    • Universal Background Checks in Minnesota
  • Programs
    • Legal Action
      • Plaintiff Search
      • MN Gun Owners Caucus v. Walz (Binary Trigger & Single Subject Clause)
      • Christopher v. Ramsey County et al. (State Fair Case)
      • Worth v. Jacobson (18-20 Permit to Carry Case)
      • New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Kevin P. Bruen (US Supreme Court)
      • Anoka Technical College Gun Ban (2019)
      • Ramsey County Elections Gun Ban (2015)
    • Minnesota Gun Report Podcast
    • Minnesota Second Amendment Sanctuaries
    • Minnesota Sheriffs & Gun Control
  • Store
  • Take Action
    • What’s happening in the 2025 Legislative Session?
    • Action Center
    • Bill Tracker
    • Contact your Elected Officials
    • Legislative Scorecard
    • Petitions
    • Historical Legislative Trackers
      • 2016 Legislative Tracker
      • 2017-2018 Legislative Tracker
      • 2023 Session
      • What’s happening in the 2024 MN Legislative Session?
  • Join/Renew
    • Get our Action Alerts
    • Donate
    • Manage your Donations/Membership
    • Join the Caucus or Renew
    • Membership Benefits
    • Reset Password

Ninth Circuit Panel rules Shutdown of Gun Stores During COVID Violated Second Amendment

January 20, 2022 By //  by Rob Doar

When COVID hit, Ventura County, California issued a series of public health orders that mandated a 48-day closure of gun shops, ammunition shops, and ranges. Los Angeles instituted an 11-day closure.

Our friends at the Firearms Policy Coalition quickly filed suit (McDougall v. Ventura County and Martinez v. Villanueva). Today, a 3-judge panel from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals overturned the two lower-court judges who declined to block the counties’ closure of gun stores.
Eventually, the counties rescinded the prohibitions, but the cases continued because the plaintiffs sought nominal damages.
For the majority in McDowell, Judge VanDyke writes:

“The Orders therefore wholly prevented law-abiding citizens in the County from realizing their right to keep and bear arms, both by prohibiting access to acquiring any firearm and ammunition, and barring practice at firing ranges with any firearms already owned,”

You may remember Judge VanDyke from his firey dissent last year after the Ninth Circuit voted to uphold California’s ban on standard capacity magazines (Duncan v. Bonta) where he said:

the common thread [in Ninth Circuit decisions] is our court’s ready willingness to bless any restriction related to guns. Respectfully, Judge Hurwitz’s claim that our judges’ personal views about the Second Amendment and guns have not affected our jurisprudence is simply not plausible. Res ipsa loquitur. (It speaks for itself)

It’s clear that a critical aspect of the right to keep and bear arms is the ability to acquire firearms, ammunition, accessories, and to practice the use of those firearms. Thankfully, these California-style lockdowns did not happen in Minnesota. The work of the Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus and our allies led to the passage of 624.7192, which SPECIFICALLY prohibits the governor from using a state of emergency to:

close or limit the operating hours of businesses that lawfully sell or service any [firearms and accessories].

Unfortunately, this victory will likely be short-lived. The counties could, and likely will, appeal this decision en-banc which will put the decision before the entire Ninth Circuit bench, instead of the three-judge panel which established this ruling.

As correctly noted by Judge VanDyke in his Duncan dissent, there is not a firearm restriction that exists that does not have the Ninth Circut’s blessing. If that’s the case, it will be up to the Supreme Court of the United States to do what they do more with the Ninth Circuit than any other court of appeals. Overturn them.

 

If you appreciate our work defending the 2nd Amendment and advocacy for the law-abiding gun owners of Minnesota, please consider joining us today.

Previous Post: « Sheriff Hutchinson DWI crash: Key takeaways from newly released investigation files
Next Post: Gun owner privacy is jeopardized in California »

Primary Sidebar

Get Email Updates

Email Address:      

Footer

Reach Us

MN GUN OWNERS CAUCUS
+1.612.424.4032

PO Box 131718
Saint Paul, MN 55113
USA


contact@gunowners.mn

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Take Action!

Get our Action Alerts

2025 Gun Control Bills

Action Center

Bill Tracker

Legislative Scorecard

Petitions

Our Programs

Legal Action

Minnesota Gun Report Podcast

Second Amendment Sanctuaries

Join/Donate

Become a 2A Defender

Join the Caucus

Donate to the Caucus

Donate to our PAC

Donate to the Support Fund

Manage your Donations/Membership

Reset Password

Site Footer

All content is Copyright © 2015-2022 by the Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus & PAC.


The Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus is a Minnesota non-profit organization, recognized by the IRS as a 501c4 non-profit.


The Minnesota Gun Owners Support Fund is a Minnesota non-profit organization, recognized by the IRS as a 501c3 non-profit.


The Minnesota Gun Owners PAC is a Minnesota state political fund, registered with the MN Campaign Finance Board. Electioneering content paid for by the Minnesota Gun Owners PAC and not authorized by any candidate or candidate committee.

Copyright © 2025 · Mai Law Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress