The trusted voice of Minnesota's Gun Owners to Defend and Restore the Right to Keep and Bear Arms

The Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus

The trusted voice of Minnesota’s Gun Owners to defend and restore the right to keep and bear arms.

JOIN US/RENEWDONATE

What's Happening in the 2026 Session?

RECENT VIDEOS

We won our binary trigger case in Minnesota. So does that make forced reset triggers legal now? Rob Doar, President of the Minnesota Gun Owners Law Center, breaks down why that question is more complicated than it looks. The binary trigger win was real, but it was narrow. The court struck down very specific 2024 language targeting a trigger that fires one round on the pull and another on the release. That language is gone. But there is still broader language in Minnesota statute covering trigger activator devices and anything that lets a semi-automatic fire more than one shot per pull, or resets and keeps firing by harnessing recoil. Could you argue that a forced reset trigger falls outside that broader language? Maybe. You might even be right. But here is the catch Rob lays out: you don't get to make that argument from your couch. You make it after you've been arrested, after you've been charged, after your property has been seized, after expert testimony, after a conviction, and after an appeal. In Minnesota courts. The bottom line: the binary trigger case was a win worth celebrating. Forced reset triggers are a separate, unsettled legal risk, and owning one could make you the test case. As Rob puts it: "I think I'm right" is a legal theory. It is not a financial plan. Watch the full breakdown below, and read our complete legal analysis here: https://gunowners.mn/learn/frequently-asked-legal-questions/forced-reset-triggers/ We'll have another video soon about why challenging the FRT ban is a much harder road than challenging the binary trigger ban was. #Minnesota2A #2A
The Binary Trigger ban was struck down, so are Forced Reset Triggers (FRTs) legal in Minnesota now?
Rep. Pam Altendorf (R-Red Wing) takes the House floor on May 14th, 2026 with one of the most pointed and emotionally clear-eyed moments of the entire HF 5140 debate. Rep. Altendorf opens with something rare in this debate: real, direct compassion for the families who have endured unimaginable tragedy — the families of the Annunciation Catholic Church and School shooting, and every other family in Minnesota whose loved ones have been touched by gun violence. But she does not stop there. Because the families deserve better than what the DFL is doing in their name. "The veil has been lifted on this gun bill." In a few short, devastating lines, Rep. Altendorf names exactly what HF 5140 actually is — and what it is not: It is not a serious bipartisan effort to address public safety. It is not a careful piece of policy crafted with the affected communities. It is opportunist political theater. It is about the 2026 election. It is about a single floor vote that can be turned into campaign mailers, social media clips, and fundraising appeals. "This is about a vote. This is about campaign literature." The families of Annunciation deserve respect. They deserve serious policy. They deserve representatives who care about the cause more than the campaign. And on May 14th, 2026, they did not get that from the DFL — they got political theater dressed up in their loved ones' memories. HF 5140 is the House clone of SF 4067 — the DFL's omnibus gun ban package that would criminalize commonly-owned semi-automatic rifles, certain shotguns and pistols, home-built firearms, and turn hundreds of thousands of law-abiding Minnesotans into felons overnight. The Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus is leading the fight against this bill. The 2026 session is in its final hours. 📞 Contact your legislator NOW: https://gunowners.mn/take-action/action-center/2026-gun-control-omnibus/ 💪 Become a 2A Defender: https://gunowners.mn/monthly 🎯 Join MNGOC: https://gunowners.mn #mnleg #2A #HF5140 #SecondAmendment #Minnesota
Rep. Pam Altendorf: This Isn't About Safety — It's About the 2026 Election
House GOP Floor Leader Rep. Harry Niska (R-Ramsey) returns to the floor on May 14th, 2026 with a follow-up that goes deeper than the "theater" line — and exposes a contradiction the DFL hoped no one would notice. The contradiction: When it comes to bipartisan discussions on protecting the security of the Capitol itself — the place where legislators work — Democrats have been willing to negotiate in good faith, without preconditions, without holding the conversation hostage to gun control. But when it comes to protecting children in Minnesota schools? That's a different story. According to Rep. Niska, in public — and especially behind closed doors — the DFL position has been clear: there will be no agreement on school safety measures unless those measures come bundled with gun bans. The DFL will help protect the Capitol without strings attached. The DFL will not help protect schoolchildren without strings attached. "Minnesotans see through your theater. And see through holding students hostage to your partisan agenda." This is the second consecutive floor moment in which Rep. Niska has used the word "theater" to describe the DFL's HF 5140 push — and this time, he names exactly who pays the price for that theater: Minnesota kids. HF 5140 is the House clone of SF 4067 — the DFL's omnibus gun ban package that would criminalize commonly-owned semi-automatic rifles, certain shotguns and pistols, home-built firearms, and turn hundreds of thousands of law-abiding Minnesotans into felons overnight. The Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus is leading the fight against this bill. The 2026 session is in its final hours. 📞 Contact your legislator NOW: https://gunowners.mn/take-action/action-center/2026-gun-control-omnibus/ 💪 Become a 2A Defender: https://gunowners.mn/monthly 🎯 Join MNGOC: https://gunowners.mn #mnleg #2A #HF5140 #SecondAmendment #Minnesota
GOP Floor Leader: "Behind Closed Doors" Democrats Refuse to Protect Students Without Gun Bans
House GOP Floor Leader Rep. Harry Niska (R-Ramsey) takes the floor on May 14th, 2026 with one of the most clear-eyed assessments of what the DFL is actually doing on HF 5140 — and why none of it is a serious legislative effort. In a sharp, structured floor speech, Rep. Niska makes three points that completely reframe what's been happening in the Minnesota House this week: **1. The DFL is filibustering their own bill.** In the entire history of legislative procedure, the party that *doesn't* want a bill to pass is the one that filibusters. This is the first time anyone can remember a party staging a sit-in to demand a vote — and then turning around and filibustering the very bill they claim to want passed. The theater can't hide the contradiction. **2. The DFL couldn't pass this even when they controlled everything.** Democrats held a trifecta — the House, the Senate, and the Governor's office — in 2023 and 2024. They had every lever of power. And they still couldn't get the votes to pass an assault weapons ban. The fact that they're suddenly demanding a vote now, in a tied House, isn't about policy. It's about the 2026 elections. **3. The Senate vote was a fraud.** The deciding Senate votes openly told their constituents — in writing — that the only reason they voted YES was because they knew it had "no chance of becoming law in the House." That isn't passage. That's permission to virtue-signal without consequence. "Minnesotans see through your theater. This isn't a serious effort to produce a bipartisan public safety solution." HF 5140 is the House clone of SF 4067 — the DFL's omnibus gun ban package that would criminalize commonly-owned semi-automatic rifles, certain shotguns and pistols, home-built firearms, and turn hundreds of thousands of law-abiding Minnesotans into felons overnight. The Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus is leading the fight against this bill. The 2026 session is in its final hours. 📞 Contact your legislator NOW: https://gunowners.mn/take-action/action-center/2026-gun-control-omnibus/ 💪 Become a 2A Defender: https://gunowners.mn/monthly 🎯 Join MNGOC: https://gunowners.mn #mnleg #2A #HF5140 #SecondAmendment #Minnesota
Rep. Harry Niska: "Minnesotans See Through Your Theater"
Rep. Jim Nash (R-Waconia) returns to the House floor on May 14th, 2026 with a simple question for the DFL's bill author, Rep. Emma Greenman — a question that exposes exactly how little the authors of HF 5140 actually understand about the firearms they're trying to ban. Rep. Nash asks Rep. Greenman if she knows what a thumbhole stock does on an Olympic biathlon rifle. Her answer: "I have never seen a biathlon. I've never met a biathlon. And I've never seen their gun." This is the legislator who wrote a sweeping gun ban that would, among countless other things, criminalize the very rifles used by Olympic biathletes — bolt-action, single-round, precision target rifles with thumbhole stocks designed for accuracy and stability. Rep. Nash then proceeds to explain — patiently — what the biathlon actually is, what kind of rifle is used, and why the thumbhole stock matters. It is one of the most quietly devastating exchanges of the entire floor debate. The DFL's bill author cannot describe what her own bill bans. That is not a minor technical gap. That is a sign that HF 5140 was never written to be a careful, narrowly-tailored public safety measure — it was written to ban as many firearms as the activist groups behind it could fit into 200 pages. HF 5140 is the House clone of SF 4067 — the DFL's omnibus gun ban package that would criminalize commonly-owned semi-automatic rifles, certain shotguns and pistols, home-built firearms, Olympic-grade target rifles, and turn hundreds of thousands of law-abiding Minnesotans into felons overnight. The Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus is leading the fight against this bill. The 2026 session is in its final hours. 📞 Contact your legislator NOW: https://gunowners.mn/take-action/action-center/2026-gun-control-omnibus/ 💪 Become a 2A Defender: https://gunowners.mn/monthly 🎯 Join MNGOC: https://gunowners.mn #mnleg #2A #HF5140 #SecondAmendment #Minnesota #Olympics #Biathlon
"I've Never Seen a Biathlon" — Rep. Greenman Caught Not Knowing What Her Own Bill Bans
Rep. Jim Nash (R-Waconia) returns to the House floor on May 14th, 2026 to dismantle one of the DFL's most-repeated talking points on HF 5140 — the claim that semi-automatic rifles, standard-capacity magazines, and other commonly-owned firearms are somehow "weapons of war" that fall outside Second Amendment protection. In a sharp, citation-driven floor moment, Rep. Nash points to Caetano v. Massachusetts — a Supreme Court case the DFL would rather you didn't know about — and reads directly from the per curiam opinion. Why does it matter? Because Caetano was a unanimous decision joined by three of the most prominent progressive justices in modern Supreme Court history: Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and the late Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Not exactly a conservative panel. And here is what they wrote — verbatim: "The Second Amendment extends, prima facie, to all instruments that constitute bearable arms, even those that were not in existence at the time of the founding." That single sentence cuts the legs out from under the entire DFL gun ban framework. The "weapons of war" talking point doesn't survive contact with the Supreme Court — and it doesn't even survive contact with the Court's most liberal members. HF 5140 is the House clone of SF 4067 — the DFL's omnibus gun ban package that would criminalize commonly-owned semi-automatic rifles, certain shotguns and pistols, home-built firearms, and turn hundreds of thousands of law-abiding Minnesotans into felons overnight. The Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus is leading the fight against this bill. The 2026 session is in its final hours. 📞 Contact your legislator NOW: https://gunowners.mn/take-action/action-center/2026-gun-control-omnibus/ 💪 Become a 2A Defender: https://gunowners.mn/monthly 🎯 Join MNGOC: https://gunowners.mn #mnleg #2A #HF5140 #SecondAmendment #Minnesota #Caetano
Even the Liberal Justices Agreed: Rep. Nash Cites Caetano v. Massachusetts
Subscribe

TAKE ACTION NOW

Legal Actions

Frequently Asked Legal Questions

Read more Frequently Asked Legal Questions

WHAT WE ARE FIGHTING FOR

The fight for the Second Amendment in Minnesota couldn’t be clearer.

Pass Constitutional Carry & Stand your Ground

Our top legislative priorities are Constitutional Carry and Stand Your Ground.

Visit our Action Center to tell your elected officials where you stand, learn who to support in upcoming elections, and see how they’ve voted.

Stop All Gun Control

We’ll never compromise on your Second Amendment rights. Our organization is opposed to all legislation and actions that infringe upon the rights of law-abiding gun owners. Our Second Amendment Sanctuary Counties program helps citizens draw a hard line against gun control efforts across the state.

Take Legal Action

We don’t stand idly by when your Second Amendment rights are being infringed in Minnesota. We’ve sued elected officials and government agencies at all levels in Minnesota – in state and federal court.

Learn more about our legal action efforts.

News

Stay up to date on the latest news about the Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus and the fight to defend and restore the right to keep and bear arms in Minnesota.

PRESS RELEASE: Minnesota Court of Appeals Affirms Victory for Gun Owners, Strikes Binary Trigger Ban as Unconstitutional

PRESS RELEASE: Minnesota Court of Appeals Affirms Victory for Gun Owners, Strikes Binary Trigger Ban as UnconstitutionalRead More

Statement on Governor Walz’s Gun Control Package

Statement on Governor Walz’s Gun Control PackageRead More

Press Release: MN Gun Owners Caucus responds to the shooting death of Alex Pretti

Press Release: MN Gun Owners Caucus responds to the shooting death of Alex PrettiRead More

PRESS RELEASE: Walz Signs Executive Orders After Gun Control Push Fails in Legislature

PRESS RELEASE: Walz Signs Executive Orders After Gun Control Push Fails in LegislatureRead More

PRESS RELEASE: Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus Sues City of Saint Paul Over Illegal Gun Ban Ordinance

PRESS RELEASE: Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus Sues City of Saint Paul Over Illegal Gun Ban OrdinanceRead More

Press Release: MN Gun Owners Caucus warns Saint Paul against unlawful firearms ordinance

Press Release: MN Gun Owners Caucus warns Saint Paul against unlawful firearms ordinanceRead More

View All Posts

Testimonials

“There isn’t another group better suited and more broadly involved that promotes and protects firearm rights in Minnesota.  Being consistently non-partisan and single-issue focused; they have had my support since their founding.”

“Being a member of the Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus and a 2nd Amendment Defender is the least I can do.

I can’t thank you guys enough for all you do. You help more women keep their right to defend themselves. I’m honored to help.”

“I support the Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus with a monthly pledge as a Second Amendment Defender and plan on increasing that support beginning in 2022.

They have provided support within the state for 2nd Amendment Sanctuary counties and are very active on the state and federal level to promote pro-firearm legislation and challenge in court when our 2nd Amendment rights are modified by local ordinances and policies.”