The trusted voice of Minnesota's Gun Owners to Defend and Restore the Right to Keep and Bear Arms

The Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus

The trusted voice of Minnesota’s Gun Owners to defend and restore the right to keep and bear arms.

JOIN US/RENEWDONATE

What's Happening in the 2026 Session?

RECENT VIDEOS

Last week? Every major gun control bill FAILED to advance. 👏 🔴 HF 3433 – Semi-auto rifle ban (felony possession, registration scheme, warrantless inspections) 🔴 HF 3402 – Magazine ban (Over 10 rounds, no grandfathering, prison time) 🔴 HF 3351 – Repeal of statewide preemption 🔴 HF 3401 – Anti-gun school carry restrictions All voted down on party lines — but still alive in committee. We were there. We testified. We fought. 💪 This week: ⚠️ HF 3668 – Creates a permanent “Office of Gun Violence Prevention” inside MN Department of Health ⚠️ HF 3357 – Ban on lawful carry across the entire Capitol complex We’re monitoring every move. And we’re not backing down. 📍 Track every bill: gunowners.mn/tracker 📍 2026 Session updates: gunowners.mn/2026 If you support this fight, join us: gunowners.mn/join Or chip in $5 to help us kill these bills: gunowners.mn/donate Stay informed. Stay engaged. Stay relentless. 🔥
🚨 Legislative Update – Week 3 at the Capitol 🚨
“The 2nd Amendment protects a fundamental civil right. It should not be recast as a public health disorder.” — MN GOC Director of Government Relations Anna Leamy testifying today against HF 3668 The DFL wants a permanent Office of Gun Control inside state government. We’re fighting back. Learn more + read our testimony: https://gunowners.mn/take-action/2026-session/3-2-2026-house-health-finance-policy/ Take action now: https://gunowners.mn/take-action/action-center/stop-the-office-of-gun-control-activism/
MN House Health Finance & Policy Hearing 3/2/26: MNGOC's Anna Leamy testifying against HF3668
Our own Anna Leamy, Director of Government Relations and Advocacy, testifies against the preemption repeal in House Elections Finance & Government Operations. Learn more about the bill & outcome of the hearing at: https://gunowners.mn/feb25hearing
MN House Elections & Gov Ops (2/25/26): Anna Leamy opposes preemption repeal.
In this powerful testimony before the Minnesota Senate Judiciary Committee in Hibbing, Minnesota, Bryan Strawser, Chairman of the Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus, lays out a clear and forceful case against Senator Ron Latz’s gun control proposal, SF 434. Speaking on behalf of thousands of law-abiding gun owners across Minnesota, Strawser dismantles the bill’s claims and exposes what it would actually do: 🚫 Expand government control beyond “sales” to all private firearm transfers 📋 Create a de facto firearm registry ⚖️ Impose new criminal penalties on responsible gun owners 💰 Add financial and logistical burdens to exercising a constitutional right 🎯 Target commonly owned firearms — including the most popular deer hunting rifle in Minnesota: the AR-15 Strawser emphasizes a core constitutional truth: The right to keep and bear arms for self-defense is an enumerated right recognized by the U.S. Supreme Court. Laws that burden lawful gun owners while doing nothing to stop criminals are not solutions — they are political theater. He also challenges misleading narratives about “internet gun sales,” highlights the failure of similar laws in other states like California, and calls on lawmakers to focus instead on prosecuting violent criminals and dismantling the illicit gun market. This testimony is a must-watch for anyone concerned about constitutional rights, public policy, and the future of gun ownership in Minnesota. ⚡ TAKE ACTION: gunowners.mn/action 📝 SIGN A PETITION: gunowners.mn/petitions ✊ JOIN THE FIGHT: gunowners.mn/join 🛡️ BECOME A 2A DEFENDER: gunowners.mn/monthly 💥 DONATE: gunowners.mn/donate #mnleg #mn2a #2A
MN Senate Judiciary - Hibbing, MN - 1/21/20: MNGOC Chair Bryan Strawser testifies against SF 434
On February 24, 2026, Amy Swearer, Senior Legal Fellow at Advancing American Freedom, testified before the House Public Safety Committee in opposition to House File 3402 and House File 3433 — legislation targeting commonly owned semi-automatic firearms and standard-capacity magazines. Amy began by acknowledging what everyone in the room agreed upon: Mass shootings are horrific. No child should feel unsafe at school. No parent should endure that kind of loss. But she urged lawmakers to confront a hard truth — and to be honest with grieving families about what these bills would and would not accomplish. Her central point was blunt: It would not have mattered whether the firearm used had a pistol grip or no pistol grip. It would not have mattered whether it had a barrel shroud or no barrel shroud. When the same caliber bullet is fired from the same length barrel with the same muzzle velocity, banning cosmetic features does not reduce lethality. It does not reduce trauma. It does not make victims “less injured.” As she stated plainly: “It’s a lie. It’s a lie we continue to repeat.” Amy also warned that these proposals would turn ordinary, law-abiding Minnesotans into felons for possessing firearms that are overwhelmingly used for lawful purposes. She further explained that when examining multi-victim shooting data in Minnesota — as detailed in the written testimony that was rejected over hyperlink technicalities — a clear pattern emerges: • Most multi-victim shootings in Minnesota are committed by repeat violent offenders • Many of these individuals are already prohibited from possessing firearms • In numerous cases, they should have been incarcerated at the time of their offenses • Policy failures in prosecution and detention — not firearm ergonomics — are what allowed them to remain free She emphasized that Annunciation, while horrific, does not fit the broader pattern of gun violence in this state. Amy closed with concern that such a serious issue was limited to only a handful of speakers on each side: “It deserves more discussion than that.” Her message was clear: If Minnesota is going to have this conversation, it must be grounded in data, reality, and an honest assessment of what actually prevents violence. 🔔 Stay informed. Stay engaged. Take action today: 👉 https://gunowners.mn/ban Join the fight to defend and restore the right to keep and bear arms in Minnesota. ✊ JOIN THE FIGHT: gunowners.mn/join 🛡️ BECOME A 2A DEFENDER: gunowners.mn/monthly 💥 DONATE: gunowners.mn/donate #mnleg #mn2a #2A
MN House Public Safety 2/24/26: Amy Swearer testifies against the gun ban bills
On February 24, 2026, Anna Leamy, Director of Government Relations and Advocacy for the Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus, testified before the House Public Safety Committee in opposition to House File 3402 and House File 3433 — legislation seeking to ban commonly owned semi-automatic rifles and standard-capacity magazines. Anna began by honoring the victims: “We grieve with the families and the entire Annunciation community. Nothing we say here today diminishes that loss.” But she made clear the Legislature’s responsibility goes beyond symbolic action. The real question is whether these bills will prevent the next attack — or create new constitutional problems without measurable safety gains. In her testimony, Anna addresses: • The exclusion of national experts and everyday Minnesotans from testifying, including policy analyst Amy Swear, whose data-driven testimony was denied over technical technicalities • The claim that only “the gun industry” opposed these bills • Minnesota’s 2024 homicide data showing 170 criminal homicide victims statewide — with all rifles combined used in just three cases • The reality that rifle homicides remain statistically rare • The fact that the Annunciation attacker used multiple firearms, including a rifle, a shotgun, and two handguns • Why targeting a firearm based on cosmetic and ergonomic features does not eliminate intent or prevent substitution • Historical examples demonstrating that the deadliest school attack in U.S. history was committed with a bomb — and the deadliest school shooting involved handguns, not a rifle Her conclusion was direct: Even if prohibition eliminated the items targeted in these bills, it would not keep children safe. Minnesotans deserve serious solutions — not partisan, symbolic measures. There are bipartisan strategies available that focus on upstream intervention and stopping dangerous individuals before violence manifests. Anna respectfully urged lawmakers to oppose HF 3402 and HF 3433 and instead pursue solutions that are constitutional, practical, and demonstrably effective. 🔔 Stay informed. Stay engaged. Take action today: 👉 https://gunowners.mn/ban Join the fight to defend and restore the right to keep and bear arms in Minnesota. ✊ JOIN THE FIGHT: gunowners.mn/join 🛡️ BECOME A 2A DEFENDER: gunowners.mn/monthly 💥 DONATE: gunowners.mn/donate #mnleg #mn2a #2A
MN House Public Safety - 2/24/2026: MNGOC Director Anna Leamy testifies against HF 3402 & HF 3433
Subscribe

TAKE ACTION NOW

Legal Actions

Frequently Asked Legal Questions

Read more Frequently Asked Legal Questions

WHAT WE ARE FIGHTING FOR

The fight for the Second Amendment in Minnesota couldn’t be clearer.

Pass Constitutional Carry & Stand your Ground

Our top legislative priorities are Constitutional Carry and Stand Your Ground.

Visit our Action Center to tell your elected officials where you stand, learn who to support in upcoming elections, and see how they’ve voted.

Stop All Gun Control

We’ll never compromise on your Second Amendment rights. Our organization is opposed to all legislation and actions that infringe upon the rights of law-abiding gun owners. Our Second Amendment Sanctuary Counties program helps citizens draw a hard line against gun control efforts across the state.

Take Legal Action

We don’t stand idly by when your Second Amendment rights are being infringed in Minnesota. We’ve sued elected officials and government agencies at all levels in Minnesota – in state and federal court.

Learn more about our legal action efforts.

News

Stay up to date on the latest news about the Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus and the fight to defend and restore the right to keep and bear arms in Minnesota.

Statement on Governor Walz’s Gun Control Package

Statement on Governor Walz’s Gun Control PackageRead More

Press Release: MN Gun Owners Caucus responds to the shooting death of Alex Pretti

Press Release: MN Gun Owners Caucus responds to the shooting death of Alex PrettiRead More

PRESS RELEASE: Walz Signs Executive Orders After Gun Control Push Fails in Legislature

PRESS RELEASE: Walz Signs Executive Orders After Gun Control Push Fails in LegislatureRead More

PRESS RELEASE: Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus Sues City of Saint Paul Over Illegal Gun Ban Ordinance

PRESS RELEASE: Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus Sues City of Saint Paul Over Illegal Gun Ban OrdinanceRead More

Press Release: MN Gun Owners Caucus warns Saint Paul against unlawful firearms ordinance

Press Release: MN Gun Owners Caucus warns Saint Paul against unlawful firearms ordinanceRead More

Press Release: Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus Launches Minnesota Gun Owners Law Center to Expand Second Amendment Legal Action

Press Release: Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus Launches Minnesota Gun Owners Law Center to Expand Second Amendment Legal ActionRead More

View All Posts

Testimonials

“The MN Gun Owners Caucus gives me a voice in 2nd amendment issues that is much more forceful than I could be on my own. Rather than being self-serving, the caucus is laser-focused on the rights of its members.

I have been and will continue to be a Second Amendment Defender.”

“The Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus & PAC has our six. They work tirelessly to ensure our 2A rights are protected. I trust the Caucus to keep me informed of the issues and I know when the opposition tries to make ‘common-sense gun legislation’ they see through the veil of deceit and protect our rights.”

“I support the Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus with a monthly pledge as a Second Amendment Defender and plan on increasing that support beginning in 2022.

They have provided support within the state for 2nd Amendment Sanctuary counties and are very active on the state and federal level to promote pro-firearm legislation and challenge in court when our 2nd Amendment rights are modified by local ordinances and policies.”