• Menu
  • Skip to right header navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary navigation
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

BECOME A 2A DEFENDER CONTACT JOIN/RENEW DONATE
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus

The trusted voice of Minnesota's Gun Owners to Defend and Restore the Right to Keep and Bear Arms

  • About
    • Activities & Results
    • Affiliates & Partners
    • Board of Directors
    • Careers
    • Contact
    • Leadership
    • Media Kit
    • Minnesota Gun Rights
    • Political Action Committee
    • Privacy Policy
    • SMS & Short Codes
  • News
    • Press Releases
  • Elections
    • 2026 Election – Governor Candidate Grades & Endorsement
    • Grading & Endorsement Criteria
    • Legislative Scorecard
  • Events
  • Learn
    • Federal Laws
    • Minnesota Laws
    • Minnesota Gun Laws Quick Reference
    • Case Law
    • Frequently Asked Legal Questions
      • Can 18-20-Year-Olds purchase Handguns in Minnesota?
      • Carrying at the State Capitol Complex
      • Constitutional Carry (Permitless Carry)
      • Courthouse Carry
      • Edible Cannabis in MN and your Gun Rights
      • Forced Reset Triggers
      • Long Guns – Carrying
      • Long Guns – Transporting
      • Open Carry
      • Permit to Carry
      • Permit to Carry Reciprocity
      • Permit to Purchase
      • Privately Manufactured Firearms (PMFs)
      • Prohibited Persons
      • Prohibited Places
      • Short Barreled Rifles & Shotguns
      • State v Kyaw Be Bee Explainer (BB Gun in a Car)
      • Suppressors (Silencers)
    • Binary Trigger Ban
    • Red Flag Gun Confiscation Orders in Minnesota
    • Universal Background Checks in Minnesota
  • Programs
    • Minnesota Gun Owners Law Center
    • Domestic Violence Resources
    • Legal Action
      • Plaintiff Search
      • MN Gun Owners Caucus v. Walz (Binary Trigger & Single Subject Clause)
      • Christopher v. Ramsey County et al. (State Fair Case)
      • Worth v. Jacobson (18-20 Permit to Carry Case)
      • New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Kevin P. Bruen (US Supreme Court)
      • Anoka Technical College Gun Ban (2019)
      • Ramsey County Elections Gun Ban (2015)
    • Minnesota Gun Report Podcast
    • Minnesota Second Amendment Sanctuaries
    • Minnesota Sheriffs & Gun Control
  • Store
  • Take Action
    • What’s happening in the 2026 Legislative Session?
    • Semi-Automatic and Magazine Bans
    • Action Center
    • Bill Tracker
    • Contact your Elected Officials
    • Grassroots Action Toolkit
    • Petitions
    • Historical Legislative Trackers
      • 2016 Legislative Tracker
      • 2017-2018 Legislative Tracker
      • 2023 Session
      • What’s happening in the 2024 MN Legislative Session?
      • What’s happening in the 2025 Legislative Session?
  • About
    • Activities & Results
    • Affiliates & Partners
    • Board of Directors
    • Careers
    • Contact
    • Leadership
    • Media Kit
    • Minnesota Gun Rights
    • Political Action Committee
    • Privacy Policy
    • SMS & Short Codes
  • News
    • Press Releases
  • Elections
    • 2026 Election – Governor Candidate Grades & Endorsement
    • Grading & Endorsement Criteria
    • Legislative Scorecard
  • Events
  • Learn
    • Federal Laws
    • Minnesota Laws
    • Minnesota Gun Laws Quick Reference
    • Case Law
    • Frequently Asked Legal Questions
      • Can 18-20-Year-Olds purchase Handguns in Minnesota?
      • Carrying at the State Capitol Complex
      • Constitutional Carry (Permitless Carry)
      • Courthouse Carry
      • Edible Cannabis in MN and your Gun Rights
      • Forced Reset Triggers
      • Long Guns – Carrying
      • Long Guns – Transporting
      • Open Carry
      • Permit to Carry
      • Permit to Carry Reciprocity
      • Permit to Purchase
      • Privately Manufactured Firearms (PMFs)
      • Prohibited Persons
      • Prohibited Places
      • Short Barreled Rifles & Shotguns
      • State v Kyaw Be Bee Explainer (BB Gun in a Car)
      • Suppressors (Silencers)
    • Binary Trigger Ban
    • Red Flag Gun Confiscation Orders in Minnesota
    • Universal Background Checks in Minnesota
  • Programs
    • Minnesota Gun Owners Law Center
    • Domestic Violence Resources
    • Legal Action
      • Plaintiff Search
      • MN Gun Owners Caucus v. Walz (Binary Trigger & Single Subject Clause)
      • Christopher v. Ramsey County et al. (State Fair Case)
      • Worth v. Jacobson (18-20 Permit to Carry Case)
      • New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Kevin P. Bruen (US Supreme Court)
      • Anoka Technical College Gun Ban (2019)
      • Ramsey County Elections Gun Ban (2015)
    • Minnesota Gun Report Podcast
    • Minnesota Second Amendment Sanctuaries
    • Minnesota Sheriffs & Gun Control
  • Store
  • Take Action
    • What’s happening in the 2026 Legislative Session?
    • Semi-Automatic and Magazine Bans
    • Action Center
    • Bill Tracker
    • Contact your Elected Officials
    • Grassroots Action Toolkit
    • Petitions
    • Historical Legislative Trackers
      • 2016 Legislative Tracker
      • 2017-2018 Legislative Tracker
      • 2023 Session
      • What’s happening in the 2024 MN Legislative Session?
      • What’s happening in the 2025 Legislative Session?

PRESS RELEASE: Hennepin County Had the Laws to Stop the Loring Park Shooter. Officials Chose Not to Use Them.

September 4, 2026 By //  by Bryan Strawser

Three chances to keep guns away from the Loring Park shooter. Three decisions not to act.

Now, Sen. Dibble and Protect Minnesota want new gun control instead of answers.

ST. PAUL, Minn. The Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus today responded to calls from Sen. Scott Dibble and anti-gun group Protect Minnesota for new gun control following Wednesday’s shooting at Shoreline Plaza in Minneapolis, which killed two residents and wounded two Minneapolis police officers.

According to court records reported by the Star Tribune, existing Minnesota law gave Hennepin County officials three separate opportunities to keep firearms away from Carlton Johnson II.

The plea deal. In 2018, Johnson was charged with domestic assault after his sister told police he threw her around an apartment and said he “was not afraid to shoot people in the face.” A domestic assault conviction would have barred him from possessing firearms under Minnesota law. Prosecutors dropped the charge and let him plead to misdemeanor property damage in 2019.

The permit. Johnson had 34 criminal cases, two assault charges, a 2012 conviction for violating a domestic abuse no-contact order, and a 2023 harassment restraining order for allegedly sexually assaulting a woman and sending her “numerous explicit death threats.” Minnesota law allows a sheriff to deny a permit to carry when documented evidence shows the applicant poses a danger to self or the public. According to news reports, the Hennepin County Sheriff’s Office reissued his permit on April 9, 2026.

The threats. In June, Johnson walked through his building with a gun, telling residents he “would kill someone,” then flashed it again two days later. A neighbor reported him to the Minneapolis Police. The case reached County Attorney Mary Moriarty’s office on August 20. Her office declined to charge him because the gun “did not leave his waistband,” and declined to seek an extreme risk protection order under Minnesota’s red flag law.

“Minnesota did not lack a law for any one of these moments. It lacked officials willing to use the ones we have,” said Bryan Strawser, Chair of the Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus. “Prosecutors pled away the conviction that would have made him a prohibited person. The sheriff looked at his record and handed him a permit. The county attorney looked at a man walking the halls with a gun, saying he would kill someone, and decided that was not enough for a charge or a red flag order. Every one of those was a choice made by an elected official.”

“Sen. Dibble and Protect Minnesota looked at those same facts and concluded the answer is to restrict the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding, peaceable gun owners who had nothing to do with this,” Strawser said. “The laws were there, nobody used them. Passing a new bill does not fix that. Asking the people who had the authority why they did nothing with it does.”

“Hennepin County voters will elect a new County Attorney this November,” Strawser added. “They deserve one who will prosecute violent criminals and protect the public instead of looking for reasons not to.”

If you appreciate our work defending the 2nd Amendment and advocacy for the law-abiding gun owners of Minnesota, please consider joining us today.

Previous Post: « Press Release: Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus & PAC Endorses Lisa Demuth for Governor

Primary Sidebar

Get Email Updates

Email Address:      

Footer

Reach Us

MN GUN OWNERS CAUCUS
+1.612.424.4032

PO Box 131718
Saint Paul, MN 55113
USA


contact@gunowners.mn

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Take Action!

Get our Action Alerts

2026 Gun Control Bills

Action Center

Bill Tracker

Legislative Scorecard

Petitions

Our Programs

Legal Action

Second Amendment Sanctuaries

Join/Donate

Become a 2A Defender

Join the Caucus

Donate to the Caucus

Manage your Donations/Membership

Reset Password

Site Footer

Privacy Policy | SMS Short Codes Policy


All content is Copyright © 2015-2022 by the Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus & PAC.


The Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus is a Minnesota non-profit organization, recognized by the IRS as a 501c4 non-profit.


The Minnesota Gun Owners Support Fund is a Minnesota non-profit organization, recognized by the IRS as a 501c3 non-profit.


The Minnesota Gun Owners PAC is a Minnesota state political fund, registered with the MN Campaign Finance Board. Electioneering content paid for by the Minnesota Gun Owners PAC and not authorized by any candidate or candidate committee.

Copyright © 2026 · Mai Law Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress